Rasputin
03-20-2011, 01:37
Last week, I went in for a physical and had them draw blood so that I could get a window into what's going on inside me. For the past almost four years, I have been eating a diet which is comprised of mostly meat with low-starch vegetables and the occasional low-sugar fruit and 85% cocoa dark chocolate. ~65% of my daily calories come from fat, especially saturated fat such as those found in Beef and Pork, Butter & Cream, eggs, and coconut milk. Zero grains. The rare sweet potato fried in coconut oil or baked with butter and cheddar cheese on top.
Meals are taken in an 8-hour window each day, leaving a 16-hour Intermittent Fast with only water the rest of the time. Hunger is notably absent right up until when I eat my first meal at 10am which usually consists of 4 eggs, butter, spinach and/or peppers, and American Cheese.
3x a week I lift heavy weights and help teach our jujutsu class, although after the warmups it is not as physically taxing as it was before I began to assume a teaching role.
I do not perform dedicated cardio exercise in the way of running, biking, treadmill, swimming, or elliptical. My heart rate does rise while lifting weights, but it is usually back to normal by the time I am finished.
On to the stats:
I am 41 years old.
My resting heart rate is 52.
My blood pressure, taken first thing in the morning, was 112/70. Before I started eating this way, my BP was hypertensive at 140/90.
I had just gotten over a bad stomach bug two days before which may skew the CBC results somewhat. Turns out that I was also getting ready to endure a bad head cold, both that and the stomach bug being the first time I had been sick in ~2 years.
UA
SpGr 1.023 Normal (1.001-1.035)
pH Ur 5.5 Normal (5.0 - 8.0)
ProtUr Negative
GlucUr Negative
Ketone 10
Hgb Ur Neg
Bili Urine Neg
Urobil Neg
Leukocyte Esterase Neg
Nitrite Neg
Sed Req Yes
WBC Ur None
RBC Urine 0-1
Epith Ur None
Bact None
CBC
WBC 3.9 Low (4.0 - 11.0)
RBC 4.71 Norm
Hgb 14.2 Norm
Hct 40.6 Low (42.0 - 52.0)
MCV 86 Norm
MCHC 34.9 Norm
RDW 12.0 Low (12.1-14.9)
Plts 229 Norm
MPV 7.3 Norm
Neut % 45 Norm
Lym % 42 Norm
Mono % 9 Norm
Eosin % 3 Norm
Baso % 1 Norm
Neut A 1.7 Norm
Lym A 1.6 Norm
Mon A 0.4 Norm
Eos A 0.1 Norm
Basos A 0.0 Norm
Chem 12:
Calcium 9.3 Norm
Gluc 89 Norm
BUN Level 24 Norm
Creatinine Level 0.79 Norm
Na 141 Norm
K 4.1 Norm
Cl 105 Norm
CO2 24 Norm
TotPrt 6.8 Norm
AST (SGOT) 21 Norm
AlkP 53 Norm
Bili T 0.8 Norm
ALT (SGPT) 19 Norm
Alb 4.1 Norm
Lipid Surv:
Chol 174 Norm
Trig 55 Norm
HDL 37 Norm
Ch/HDL Ratio 5 Norm
LDL 126 Near Optimal/above optimal
LDL/HDL 3 Near Optimal/above optimal
TSH:
TSH Ultrasensitive 1.481 Norm
Insulin Level 3.2 Norm
25 Hydroxy D Total (D2 + D3) -- 117.96 High
Now, the first letter that the doctor sent back to me in the mail about this had NO data. It was a cover sheet only and it stated:
"Labs were all normal except for elevated LDL cholesterol. I recommend you get your first stress test & can discuss getting further lipid studies with cardiologist."
So much to take away from this experience.
First of all, a stress test isn't going to show anything. It will only give an anomalous result if I have already received damage to my heart muscle, and there's no reason that I would have that at 41 years old with no other symptoms and labs that look that good. I understand that he is just a family physician, but come on.
Second, I asked him specifically to order a particle size test on the lipid panel because the number listed under LDL above is not an accurate measurement of the amount of cholesterol being ferried about by my LDL particles. That is a calculated amount, and it is skewed horribly in cases where triglycerides are as low as they are in my case (which is a good thing, by the way).
The Friedewald Equation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LDL#Estimation_of_LDL_particles_via_cholesterol_co ntent) is the method used by labs to estimate the amount of LDL in your blood. It states:
L = C − H − 0.16T
Plugging in my numbers, you get:
L = 174 - 37 - 0.16 * 55
L = 128.2, or ~ the 126 listed above.
The problem is that we are subtracting triglycerides from the total, and if trigs drop precipitously, the remainder (which is assumed to be the LDL containing cholesterol) must rise.
However, the "Iranian" equation, found here:
http://homepages.slingshot.co.nz/~geoff36/LDL_mg.htm
...provides a much more accurate estimate when triglycerides are lower than the Standard American population.
Plugging my numbers into that calculator, you find that the number for LDL that results is 103.52, which is a lot closer to the 100 that has arbitrarily been assigned as being healthy.
But we're not yet done. When triglycerides are <90, what is usually found is that the LDl particles which are present are in the form of large, fluffy bundles of lipids (including cholesterol but also other fats) which are benign and not atherogenic.
The only way to tell for sure is to have an LDL subfraction/particle size test, which is what I asked for in the first place. It's a shame when you have to educate your own doctor in how to do his job.
Now, honestly, I expected to see a higher result for my HDL. After all, dietary saturated fat raises HDL better than anything short of a statin drug, and we simply aren't going there. I have added more saturated fat to my diet since receiving these results and will repeat the lipid panel in the next year to see if I can bring this up. Others eating a similar Paleo/LC diet report HDL of 60 or higher. It could be that they are getting more sleep than I am (avg. of 5 hours a night thanks to my kids), or that they are getting more exercise than me (known to raise HDL). It could also be down due to my being sick the week before, since cholesterol is involved in repairing the body's tissues.
Regardless, I am pleased with these numbers.
References:
http://www.amazon.com/Genocide-Your-Doctors-Dietary-Ignorance/dp/1419685821/ref=sr_1_6?ie=UTF8&qid=1300602556&sr=8-6
http://www.amazon.com/Great-Cholesterol-Really-Causes-Disease/dp/1844546101/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1300602574&sr=1-1
http://www.amazon.com/Fat-Cholesterol-are-Good-You/dp/919755538X/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1300602595&sr=1-1
http://www.amazon.com/Ignore-Awkward-Cholesterol-Myths-Alive/dp/1453759409/ref=sr_1_3?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1300602595&sr=1-3
http://www.amazon.com/Know-Your-Fats-Understanding-Cholesterol/dp/0967812607/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1300602620&sr=1-1
Meals are taken in an 8-hour window each day, leaving a 16-hour Intermittent Fast with only water the rest of the time. Hunger is notably absent right up until when I eat my first meal at 10am which usually consists of 4 eggs, butter, spinach and/or peppers, and American Cheese.
3x a week I lift heavy weights and help teach our jujutsu class, although after the warmups it is not as physically taxing as it was before I began to assume a teaching role.
I do not perform dedicated cardio exercise in the way of running, biking, treadmill, swimming, or elliptical. My heart rate does rise while lifting weights, but it is usually back to normal by the time I am finished.
On to the stats:
I am 41 years old.
My resting heart rate is 52.
My blood pressure, taken first thing in the morning, was 112/70. Before I started eating this way, my BP was hypertensive at 140/90.
I had just gotten over a bad stomach bug two days before which may skew the CBC results somewhat. Turns out that I was also getting ready to endure a bad head cold, both that and the stomach bug being the first time I had been sick in ~2 years.
UA
SpGr 1.023 Normal (1.001-1.035)
pH Ur 5.5 Normal (5.0 - 8.0)
ProtUr Negative
GlucUr Negative
Ketone 10
Hgb Ur Neg
Bili Urine Neg
Urobil Neg
Leukocyte Esterase Neg
Nitrite Neg
Sed Req Yes
WBC Ur None
RBC Urine 0-1
Epith Ur None
Bact None
CBC
WBC 3.9 Low (4.0 - 11.0)
RBC 4.71 Norm
Hgb 14.2 Norm
Hct 40.6 Low (42.0 - 52.0)
MCV 86 Norm
MCHC 34.9 Norm
RDW 12.0 Low (12.1-14.9)
Plts 229 Norm
MPV 7.3 Norm
Neut % 45 Norm
Lym % 42 Norm
Mono % 9 Norm
Eosin % 3 Norm
Baso % 1 Norm
Neut A 1.7 Norm
Lym A 1.6 Norm
Mon A 0.4 Norm
Eos A 0.1 Norm
Basos A 0.0 Norm
Chem 12:
Calcium 9.3 Norm
Gluc 89 Norm
BUN Level 24 Norm
Creatinine Level 0.79 Norm
Na 141 Norm
K 4.1 Norm
Cl 105 Norm
CO2 24 Norm
TotPrt 6.8 Norm
AST (SGOT) 21 Norm
AlkP 53 Norm
Bili T 0.8 Norm
ALT (SGPT) 19 Norm
Alb 4.1 Norm
Lipid Surv:
Chol 174 Norm
Trig 55 Norm
HDL 37 Norm
Ch/HDL Ratio 5 Norm
LDL 126 Near Optimal/above optimal
LDL/HDL 3 Near Optimal/above optimal
TSH:
TSH Ultrasensitive 1.481 Norm
Insulin Level 3.2 Norm
25 Hydroxy D Total (D2 + D3) -- 117.96 High
Now, the first letter that the doctor sent back to me in the mail about this had NO data. It was a cover sheet only and it stated:
"Labs were all normal except for elevated LDL cholesterol. I recommend you get your first stress test & can discuss getting further lipid studies with cardiologist."
So much to take away from this experience.
First of all, a stress test isn't going to show anything. It will only give an anomalous result if I have already received damage to my heart muscle, and there's no reason that I would have that at 41 years old with no other symptoms and labs that look that good. I understand that he is just a family physician, but come on.
Second, I asked him specifically to order a particle size test on the lipid panel because the number listed under LDL above is not an accurate measurement of the amount of cholesterol being ferried about by my LDL particles. That is a calculated amount, and it is skewed horribly in cases where triglycerides are as low as they are in my case (which is a good thing, by the way).
The Friedewald Equation (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LDL#Estimation_of_LDL_particles_via_cholesterol_co ntent) is the method used by labs to estimate the amount of LDL in your blood. It states:
L = C − H − 0.16T
Plugging in my numbers, you get:
L = 174 - 37 - 0.16 * 55
L = 128.2, or ~ the 126 listed above.
The problem is that we are subtracting triglycerides from the total, and if trigs drop precipitously, the remainder (which is assumed to be the LDL containing cholesterol) must rise.
However, the "Iranian" equation, found here:
http://homepages.slingshot.co.nz/~geoff36/LDL_mg.htm
...provides a much more accurate estimate when triglycerides are lower than the Standard American population.
Plugging my numbers into that calculator, you find that the number for LDL that results is 103.52, which is a lot closer to the 100 that has arbitrarily been assigned as being healthy.
But we're not yet done. When triglycerides are <90, what is usually found is that the LDl particles which are present are in the form of large, fluffy bundles of lipids (including cholesterol but also other fats) which are benign and not atherogenic.
The only way to tell for sure is to have an LDL subfraction/particle size test, which is what I asked for in the first place. It's a shame when you have to educate your own doctor in how to do his job.
Now, honestly, I expected to see a higher result for my HDL. After all, dietary saturated fat raises HDL better than anything short of a statin drug, and we simply aren't going there. I have added more saturated fat to my diet since receiving these results and will repeat the lipid panel in the next year to see if I can bring this up. Others eating a similar Paleo/LC diet report HDL of 60 or higher. It could be that they are getting more sleep than I am (avg. of 5 hours a night thanks to my kids), or that they are getting more exercise than me (known to raise HDL). It could also be down due to my being sick the week before, since cholesterol is involved in repairing the body's tissues.
Regardless, I am pleased with these numbers.
References:
http://www.amazon.com/Genocide-Your-Doctors-Dietary-Ignorance/dp/1419685821/ref=sr_1_6?ie=UTF8&qid=1300602556&sr=8-6
http://www.amazon.com/Great-Cholesterol-Really-Causes-Disease/dp/1844546101/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1300602574&sr=1-1
http://www.amazon.com/Fat-Cholesterol-are-Good-You/dp/919755538X/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1300602595&sr=1-1
http://www.amazon.com/Ignore-Awkward-Cholesterol-Myths-Alive/dp/1453759409/ref=sr_1_3?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1300602595&sr=1-3
http://www.amazon.com/Know-Your-Fats-Understanding-Cholesterol/dp/0967812607/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1300602620&sr=1-1