View RSS Feed

TonyU

Karate To Survive in the U.S. in the 21st Century.

Rate this Entry
Karate to survive in the U.S. in the 21st Century.

I decided to write this after considerable thought about Karate, it’s transmission, and survivability in U.S. This is more prevalent now with the advent of MMA and people’s perception of “real world scenarios” or “street self defense.” I could argue that most people have these perceptions wrong, but unfortunately that isn’t going to help get students in the door or help spread the art of karate.
For some of these suggestions to work one must think outside the box. Also, one must break away from what they perceive to be “traditional” way of teaching. One can teach and train in good solid karate unchanged the way it is or was taught in Okinawa, but with the American mentality. That is the crux of this writing, the American mentality or personality if you will. We are a culture of “now”, of immediate gratification, or for lack of a better term, impatience. Instead of trying to change that in your students or potential students work with it and use it to your advantage.
Lets start with kata. In Okinawa or in a traditional setting one would learn kata and the sensei would have the student memorize the kata, have them perform the kata, but wouldn’t teach any of the applications or bunkai until much later. This is due to either the feeling that students are not ready or that they must figure it out on their own. Unfortunately in our culture the majority of the students are going to quit. We are a culture of “why’s.” With control and without detracting from the overall class “whys” can be answered and demonstrated. Once can teach at the level of the student. If a karate sensei is well versed in their system then they know that there are multitudes of bunkai for a given technique in a kata. I like Iha sensei’s philosophy and method of teaching bunkai. That is, there is a beginner bunkai and an advanced bunkai. I also firmly believe that demonstrating the occasional bunkai the student has a better understanding of what they’re doing in the kata.
Now to self-defense: Self defense as a karateka is strongly tied to our kata. Again this must be taught from the beginning and shown to the student that karate has good practical self-defense. If one goes into boxing, MMA gym, or other type of what’s described as a “combative” sport one will get from the beginning applicable and obvious techniques. Karate must do the same. A potential student does not want to wait until six months down the road to be able to perform basic techniques in a potential self-defense situation. Eventually the techniques must be slowly worked up in speed and strength and with resistance. A thousand punches in sumo stance on the first day, while that may work in Okinawa, will run most of your students out the door pretty quick.
Sparring or fighting: You have to fight, of course with control and protective gear. The old adage of “Well, we didn’t have gear when I was coming up in the ranks.” Isn’t going to cut it. One, in our litigious society that will get you sued if someone gets hurt. Here (U.S.) you need insurance and most insurance won’t cover you unless your students have protective gear. Two, we are dealing with people that have to get up in the morning and go to their jobs the next day. They’re not professional fighters. Again, this can be done slowly and build people's confidence with patience and techniques.
All the above can be done and will work without sacrificing the intergrity of your art. You are still teaching your art, it’s basics, kata, and curriculum but in a different format. For it to work ego has no place within ones teachings. One must be able to adapt and be unselfish in ones teachings.

Submit "Karate To Survive in the U.S. in the 21st Century." to Digg Submit "Karate To Survive in the U.S. in the 21st Century." to del.icio.us Submit "Karate To Survive in the U.S. in the 21st Century." to StumbleUpon Submit "Karate To Survive in the U.S. in the 21st Century." to Google Submit "Karate To Survive in the U.S. in the 21st Century." to Facebook

Updated 03-31-2013 at 13:02 by TonyU

Tags: None Add / Edit Tags
Categories
Uncategorized

Comments

  1. Webmaster's Avatar
    Good blog Tony. On the "Now" society, I think we can also say the "Me" generation has spread to the whole of society and is part of the need for instant gratification most seem to have. It's sad because most things that offer instant gratification have a pretty short life span on the gratification front. Those things that we work hard for and earn, stay with us forever.
  2. R. Johnson's Avatar
    Funny you should write a blog entry on this subject. I've spent a lot of time thinking about this lately.
  3. jjaje's Avatar
    Good post Tony, let me throw something out there using an analogy, and I'll try not to offend people in the process.

    Most people here probably don't know this, but my wife and I actually go to one of those mega churches, definitely in the top 100, probably in the top 50 in size in the U.S. - We started in 1990, before we were married, she was a volunteer at one of those seeker friendly churches that met in a high school for people that have been turned off by the "traditional" church. Back then it had about 300 people in attendance, this last Christmas it had about 40,000 come through, and the weekly average is maybe around 12-15,000

    What's interesting, is it is hard to pinpoint what has made it successful when others are not as much. There have been tons of churches that started in high schools, trying to be more contemporary, but have failed, or not had the same growth. But to make a parallel to your blog, at the same time, many more traditional churches, facing declining enrollment, especially of younger families, have tried different things to positively alter their attendance. Maybe they decide to start doing dramas, maybe thy start playing very different music (with drums & electric guitars, etc), maybe they try videos, or topical messages.

    Anecdotally, as I don't have real data, those changes often seem to do the opposite. They disenfranchise many of the regular attenders, without bringing in the additional attendance they had hoped for. All the while, there is still demand for a traditional service, and people that regularly and faithfully go to them.

    Ironically, some people that were turned off by the traditional church and started going to our church, after some time, they suddenly decide they want something more traditional and actually leave for something more traditional. When brought up in conversation with our pastor, he actually thinks that's great, and is truly glad for them.

    So, I think it's possible, in the ebb and flow of people, and how generations change, I think there is always a demand for the multiple options. However the demand of each individual option increases and decreases with the changing tide. Part of me believes that many these 20 somethings that come from a McDojo and suddenly want to try something "real" will want to stay in martial arts practice, but maybe something traditional, as they mature.

    Just some thoughts, and was not trying to start a religious discussion, just using it as an analogy.
    Updated 03-30-2013 at 08:37 by jjaje (typos)
  4. Tripitaka of AA's Avatar
    So, modify the teaching method to cope with the attitudes of the students. I'm sure that there are examples of exactly this flexibility among all the earlier generations.. and equally a lot of occasions where the Instructor's model is not appreciated as being ideal. The Instructor who teaches monotonous repetition without explanation may end up with a class full of very dedicated, trusting, pliant acolytes... or a very empty Dojo. There are Instructors who have searched for ways to adapt the teaching method, only to find that the students prefer the older ways (akin to the worshippers in Jeff's post above).

    One thing I know, is that the attitudes of young people in Japan (and I have to assume in Okinawa too) still find it easier to learn using a more formal, less "democratic", less spontaneous, more traditional style than US or UK students are used to. This is something that goes right across the socialisation and education system in Japan, not something unique to the Martial Arts. In truth, there are many Japanese teens at school who are turned off MA by the "boring, traditional, old-fashioned ways", just as they would be in the US or UK, but they are still conditioned to join in their High School Clubs in Soccer, Volleyball, Handball, Tennis, etc. where they train the same Taiso exercises (warm-ups), have the same hierarchy of Sempai-Kohai and commit to the same intensity of training that made the MA stylists from Japan so different from those abroad. High School students in Japan will go to after-school clubs 6 days a week for 2-3 hour sessions. Very often these clubs are self-regulating, self-run by the students. Repetition and hard drilling are exactly what these clubs need to fill the time. The students end up sharp, toned and lightning fast - but sometimes limited in their understanding of finer points. The real instruction is given later. That's how things work for those students. If your students come with different attitudes, I think it is only natural to tailor the teaching to some extent.

    I'm rambling. I enjoyed the blog Tony, I would like to read more of your thoughts.