Hello,
Posted by Lawrence Fisher:
"Personally, I do not see any of the koryu leaving Japan."
_____________
The above statement is incorrect both in fact and perception. Some Koryu have already left Japan and are being successfully taught beyond its shores. Others have very high level practitioners teaching outside Japan. Tenshin Shoden Katori Shinto ryu, Shindo Yoshin ryu, Yagyu Shinkage ryu, Muso Jikiden Eishin ryu, Mugai ryu, Buko ryu, Araki ryu and Shinto Muso ryu are just a few.
Posted by Lawrence Fisher:
"Sure, there will be this ryu and that popping up, but once they begin to teach, deviate from the intial idea or begin to play, it no longer remains koryu, but rather becomes something new."
______________
This statement is rather confounding. Is it your contention the none of the above mentioned schools are maintaining their core concepts outside Japan? I completely agree that if a Koryu deviates from its purpose or defining characteristics without a proper methodology to do so, that it is in danger of becoming something so separated from its origins that it is no longer true to it roots. However to claim than no Koryu can maintain its unique identity beyond Japan is just an incorrect supposition. One that can be proved wrong by the evidence at hand. As an example I will site just one facet of the tradition that I represent. In the Takamura ha Shindo Yoshin ryu all joden licensed instructors must learn to perform several Shinto ceremonies with accompanying norito, all spoken accurately in an archaic and complex dialect of Japanese. These ceremonies must be excruciatingly memorized in their entirety and understood within the cultural context of their creation. These ceremonies constitute an important part of our traditions okuden. Do you have any idea how many budo or Koryu practitioners studying inside Japan right now can perform such a ritual peroperly? Very few I'm here to tell you. Yet this level of knowledge and deep cultural understanding is presently available outside Japan if one is dedicated enough to find it.
Another contention you seem to make that I take umbridge with is the idea that any change within a koryu is necessarily degeneration. This opinion is a common fallacy proposed by those with no deep historical perspective on Koryu or beholden to a particular political mindset . The facts show that successful Koryu constantly changed and evolved so they could meet the challenges met on the field of battle. Only after the warring era ended did many koryu cease to evolve in a way that was true to their roots. Those that stagnated or evolved poorly degenerated into either souless kata-fied dance or quasi-modern budo with just a koryu name. Other Koryu have carefully evolved in a way that is true to their roots. These koryu remain vibrant reflections of the core concepts they were founded on. They are living traditions as opposed to historical skeletons.
No transmission of Koryu can be 100% complete. It is impossible. Therefore something of value must be added in each generation or eventually the art will wither and die. But change for change sake is rife with risk. Change must be judiciously pursued only by someone intimately qualified for such a task. Deliberate technical innovation and evolution sensitive to a traditions soul is the only way koryu can survive into the future as a valuable commodity worthy of preservation.
I suggest you read the interview I did with my teacher, Yukio Takamura that now appears on the Aikido Journal Website. It covers this topic as well as any ever written.
www.aikidojournal.com
Dave Maynard / Menkyo Kaiden
Takamura ha Shindo Yoshin ryu