Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Member swdw's Avatar
    Name
    Sam Walker
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Colorado
    Martial Art
    Goju-Ryu, Kobudo
    Age
    53
    Posts
    243
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default 21 foot rule valid?

    Go here and read the article (starts at part II.):
    http://www.forcesciencenews.com/home/current.html
    Grand Master of Two Finger Typing Style (Also known as Hunt and Peck Fu)

  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Name
    Bob Blackburn
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    30
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    From what I have read, yes.
    Bob Blackburn

  3. #3
    Account Closed at Members Request
    Name
    Kit Leblanc
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Pac NW
    Age
    44
    Posts
    475
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    It's not that it is invalid - it's that you have to look at it the right way. The same with the concept of the "Force Continuum." Look at it the wrong way and it is worthless.

  4. #4
    Member Fletch1's Avatar
    Name
    Fletch Fuller
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Age
    47
    Posts
    231
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Useful as a point of reference and a reminder of the importance of proximity and danger cue awareness. As a tactical rule I don't think it carries much weight by itself. It also seems to create a paranoia that an officer cannot defend himself inside this distance.

    The Tueller (sp?) drill was set up with an armed officer facing a man with a knife who, on signal rushed at him and tried to stab him. The officer's goal was to draw his weapon and manage to get off two center mass shots prior to the attacker reaching him. On your mark, get set, go. A test of reaction time? Maybe. A predictor of what and how you will react and perform in a scenario that involves different cues, levels of awareness, environmental obstacles, etc? I don't think so.

    Just like the suggested 4-6 foot reactionary gap taught to police recruits, 21 feet is just a number. It is not a rule that will generally replace common sense.

    Just my opinion.
    Fletch Fuller
    www.defense-ops.com
    www.isrmatrix.org

  5. #5
    Moderator Emeritus TonyU's Avatar
    Name
    Tony "Iron Hands" Urena
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Land of the free, home of the brave.
    Martial Art
    Okinawan Karate & Kobudo
    Age
    47
    Posts
    11,373
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Everyone here is pretty much on the same page. I agree, in it of itself is not enough.
    It can be a strating point, but it hast to be built upon it.
    The distance wouldn't make a difference if the officer is not tactically aware or prepared.
    "I don't lift, too heavy. I don't run, too far. I just hit people.

    "The teacher is more important than the style."
    - Higa Yuchoku

  6. #6
    Member
    Name
    Andy Mest
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    East Coast
    Martial Art
    Mostly Japanese styles
    Age
    43
    Posts
    122
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    This is just one of those many instances where I'm glad to be military not an LEO. If I'm rushed with a knife for real I usually have some sort of automatic weapon out already. Heck, I wouldn't even make a good marine. I can't deal with really stupid ROE and to me, anytime you can't kill someone whose trying to kill you... I understand the need for LEO to differentiate between, say, a gun and a wallet. I'm just glad I'm not sent to places where that's a problem. Kudos to you guys. (kudo: I don't even pretend to speak japanese, but doesn't that mean the Way of Bending Over?)
    -Andy Mest
    Si vis pacem, para bellum

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •